Legal Opinion

Clapp v. Olympic View Publishing Co.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 17, 2007No. 34473-4-IIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Stephen Clapp and Sequim Valley Ranch appeal the dismissal of their defamation action against Olympic View Publishing. The defamation action *473centered on Olympic View’s publication of a Sequim Valley employee’s allegations, contained in a petition for a protective order, that Clapp had pressured employees to commit penury in support of Sequim Valley in another lawsuit. The trial court ruled that the fair reporting privilege protected Olympic View’s publication of any possibly defamatory statements the employee made in her pleadings. Because the allegedly defamatory article is an accurate…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mark v. Seattle TimesWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Herron v. Tribune Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Cutler v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Caruso v. Local Union No. 690Washington Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Campbell v. New York Evening Post, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Trainor v. the Standard TimesSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
  2. McNamara v. KoehlerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  3. Clapp v. OLYMPIC VIEW PUB. CO., LLC.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  4. Clapp v. Olympic View Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2007
  5. Tracy S. Mcnamara v. Karen KoehlerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API