Bliss v. Carmona

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

NESBITT, Judge.

On motion for rehearing, Carmona asserts that we overlooked or failed to consider his argument that he assumed the three existing mortgages encumbering the subject real property at the time of closing. Because we have fully disposed of that argument, we would summarily strike the motion for rehearing were it the only ground presented. Fla.R.App.P. 9.330(a).

However, Carmona also contends that we have deprived him of the opportunity to be heard on the remaining grounds asserted in his response to the motion to vacate the judgment of specific performance,…