Legal Opinion
Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. Mattingly
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided December 12, 1958PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, Judge.
In this action plaintiff, Spencer Mattingly, sued defendant, Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company (herein referred to as “L. & N.”), to recover damages growing out of an injury received by him because of the alleged negligence of L. & N.’s employees in conducting a switching movement. The case was tried before a jury and a verdict of $20,000 was returned in favor of Mattingly.
L. & N. has appealed from the judgment entered, advancing eight grounds for reversal. We have determined that one of the contentions urged for setting aside the judgment must be sustained, namely, that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hall v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1955
- Dempsey v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. PlummerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. ParsonsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
- Bennett v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Edward L. Flanigan v. Burlington Northern Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Michaud v. SteckinoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Gorham v. Farmington Motor Inn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad Co. v. MattinglyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1960
- Huddell v. LevinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1975
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.