Legal Opinion

David Bradley & Co. v. Burk

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 16, 1900No. Nos. 12,233—(67)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Stevens county, Steidl, J.

1Opinion of the CourtLewis, J.

Appeal by defendant from an order of tbe trial court in proceedings supplementary to execution, directing defendant to pay oyer to plaintiff’s attorneys $260.

The evidence upon which the court based the order was taken by a referee appointed by the court for that purpose, and it is submitted by appellant that the evidence is not sufficient to support the order. The order contains a finding to the effect that defendant had $260 in his possession and under his control and owned by him at the time of the service upon him of the order in supplementary proceedings. The defendant was subjected to a…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reese v. BakerSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  2. Johnson v. BrajkovichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Hansen v. Daniel Hayes Co. of IdahoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API