Legal Opinion

Wells v. Floyd, Guardian

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 23, 1946No. 4-8025Published

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

This is a direct appeal prosecuted, within the time allowed by law, from the order and judgment of the Fulton Probate Court refusing to vacate a probate order for the sale of a tract of land owned by Hugh Isbell, am incompetent person. There are, in fact, two appeals, one from the order of sale, the other from the judgment refusing to vacate that order.

The order sought to be vacated reads as follows:

“On this the 7th day of Feb., 1946, is presented to the Court the petition of Shelby E. Floyd, Guardian of Hugh Isbell, incompetent ward, asking for authority to sell the following lands belonging…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Overton v. PorterfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  2. Grogan v. WeatherbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API