Legal Opinion

Crumbaker v. Kelly

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1979No. 10134PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*744OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from a district court judgment quieting title in respondents, Thomas and Helen Kelly. The district court concluded that respondents, as mortgagees in possession, had satisfied all the statutory requirements of adverse possession pursuant to the provisions of NRS 11.150.

Respondents conveyed property described as lots 18, 19 and 20 in block 54 of Goldfield, Nevada, together with buildings and household furnishings, by grant deed to Mr. and Mrs. Crumbaker in 1964. In exchange therefor, Mr. and Mrs. Crumbaker executed a mortgage in favor of the Kellys. The property was…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Petroleum Carrier Corp. v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  2. Cory v. Santa Ynez Land & Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Borden v. ClowNevada Supreme Court · 1892

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Potts v. VokitsNevada Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Dayton Valley Investors, LLC v. Union Pacific RailroadDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API