Erik Wayne Hollie v. State of Mississippi
Mississippi Supreme Court
1DissentRandolph, Presiding Justice
¶ 56. The result would be no different, whether this Court follows the well-established legal principle of waiver, or if this Court applies a proper plain-error analysis. Either endeavor results in the same outcome-the claimed error was harmless and did not result in a manifest miscarriage of justice. Our goal is to insure that Hollie had a fair trial. Fair trials are measured by a court’s confidence in their outcome. Based on the specific record before us, a manifest miscarriage of justice which prejudiced the outcome cannot be identified. Even if error is shown by the trial court’s failure…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.