Legal Opinion

Stowe v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 2014No. S-13-0219PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Justice.

[§1] Sarah Stowe entered a conditional nolo contendere 1 plea to a felony charge of fourth-offense driving while under the influence of alcohol, reserving the right to appeal the district court's denial of her motion to suppress evidence. We affirm.

ISSUES

Stowe contends that the results of a urine alcohol test should have been suppressed for two reasons:

1. Her urine was collected pursuant to an arrest that was unlawful because the arresting officer lacked probable cause to believe that she had been driving while intoxicated.

2. The result of her urinalysis was invalid because it…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Ostrowski v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  3. United States v. ChavezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  4. Redco Construction v. Profile Properties, LLCWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  5. BP America Production Co. v. Department of RevenueWyoming Supreme Court · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pier v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Anderson v. State ex rel. Dep't of HealthWyoming Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Antoine Devonne ButlerWyoming Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API