Legal Opinion

Keegan v. Sage

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided September 15, 1893PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Action by Delia Keegan against Bussell Sage for breach of marriage promise. Plaintiff moves to strike out a portion of the answer as irrelevant, redundant, and scandalous.

1Opinion of the CourtPryor, J.

In a complaint for breach of promise, the plaintiff says that “she was, and ever had been, chaste, and a virgin.” The defendant denies the allegation, and asserts affirmatively that she has led a profligate life. The paragraph containing this portion of the answer the plaintiff moves to strike out, as irrelevant, redundant, and scandalous. Obviously, if the allegation in the complaint be material, a denial of it can be neither irrelevant, redundant, nor scandalous. Dovan v. Dinsmore, 33 Barb. 36. On the other hand, if the allegation be immaterial, its insertion in the complaint entitles the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Struver v. Ocean InsuranceNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1859

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tribune Ass'n v. FollwellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API