Legal Opinion
Cornhusker Casualty Insurance v. Kachman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 13, 2009No. 06-35106PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
In an order filed on January 30, 2008, we certified the following question to the Washington Supreme Court:
Does sending notice of cancellation by certified mail satisfy the “mailed” requirement of RCW § 48.18.290 (1997) and give sufficient notice of cancellation to comply with RCW § 48.18.290, even if there is no proof that the cancellation letter was received by the insured?
Cornhusker Cas. Ins. Co. v. Kachman, 514 F.3d 982, 988-89 (9th Cir.2008). On December 18, 2008, the Washington Supreme Court answered the question in the negative. Accordingly, the opinion filed on January 30, 2008…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- In Re E.R. Fegert, Inc., Debtor. Dan O'rourke, Trustee v. Seaboard Surety Company Coral Construction Company, Inc. Shotwell Paving CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Rick Summers v. A. Teichert & Son, Inc., a California CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Saunders v. Lloyd's of LondonWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Buono v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kaass Law v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Carmen Flores Castro v. Bertha Hernandez RenteriaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Maverick Gaming LLC v. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Boracchia v. Biomet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Boracchia v. Biomet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.