Legal Opinion
Hill v. Jindal
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 17, 2015No. Nos. 2014 CA 1757, 2014 CW 1484PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPettigrew, J.
| sDefendants challenge the trial court’s judgment, granting a preliminary injunction in favor of plaintiffs and intervenor and denying their exceptions raising the objections of no cause of action, lack of subject matter jurisdiction, prematurity, and improper cumulation. For the reasons that follow, we amend the trial court’s September 10, 2014 judgment and affirm as amended. Wé also deny defendants’ application for a writ of supervisory review.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
This action commenced with a petition for preliminary and permanent injunctions, and declaratory relief filed on July…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Board of Directors v. All TaxpayersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
- Concerned Citizens v. Parish of TangipahoaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2005
- Aguillard v. TreenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- State v. AlfonsoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
- Torbert Land Co. v. Montgomergy, 2010-2009 (La. 12/17/10)Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2010
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Stevens v. St. Tammany Parish GovernmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Unisys Corp. v. La. Office of Motor VehiclesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Brookwood-Riverside, L.L.C. v. The Baton Rouge Water Works Company and The Baton Rouge Water CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2021
- City of Baker School Board v. Board of Elementary and Secondary Education, Recovery School District, and GEO Academies EBRLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2025
- City of Baker School Board v. Board of Elementary and Secondary Education, Recovery School District, and GEO Academies EBRLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2025
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.