Legal Opinion

Moorman v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 9, 1983No. 82-281PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Per curiam

The sole issue presented is whether the charges for the crowning of teeth as part of the treatment for temporomandibular joint syndrome are excluded from coverage under the exclusionary provision dealing *22with “Mouth Conditions” in the insurance contract. For the reasons that follow, this court holds that such charges may be recovered under the terms of the policy.

At the outset, it is apposite to bear in mind that “[a] contract of insurance prepared and phrased by the insurer is to be construed liberally in favor of the insured and strictly against the insurer, where the meaning of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Home Indemnity Co. v. Village of PlymouthOhio Supreme Court · 1945
  2. American Financial Corp. v. Fireman's Fund Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Munchick v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. North River Insurance Company v. Cigna Reinsurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. King v. Nationwide InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Hybud Equipment Corp. v. Sphere Drake InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Pure Tech Systems, Inc. v. Mt. Hawley InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  5. Park-Ohio Industries, Inc., and Tocco, Inc. v. The Home Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API