Legal Opinion

Cuccarini v. Rosenfeld

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 26, 2011No. 3D09-3470PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFernandez, J.

This is an appeal from a final judgment on the pleadings entered in favor of the appellees Miguel Rosenfeld and Clarissa Rosenfeld, the sellers. We reverse and remand because there are factual questions that undermine the trial court’s conclusion that the sellers were entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

On August 22, 2008, Roberto Cuccarini and Miguel and Clarissa Rosenfeld executed a Residential Sale and Purchase Contract. The closing was to occur on or by March 1, 2009. The contract required that the buyer, Cuccarini, deposit $82,500 into an escrow account held by the broker, *329Fortune…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. Lang Equities, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  2. Tanglewood Mobile Sales, Inc. v. HachemDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  3. Britt v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  4. Mechaia Investments, LLC v. RomanoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Glenn v. RobertsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  2. Sealy v. Perdido Key Oyster Bar & Marina, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
  3. NEIMAN NIX, etc. v. THE OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER OF BASEBALL, etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API