Legal Opinion
The Sue
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided March 29, 1905PublishedCited by 2 opinions
In Admiralty.
1Opinion of the Court
PÜRNEFL, District Judge.
On the 24th day of December, 1904, a libel was filed for services upon and material furnished to the steam tug Sue at the special instance and request of the owners thereof, amounting to $303.99, upon the filing of which, with proper stipulations, an attachment and monition were issued December 26th, and were duly returned December 2Sth. After seizure, Richard Barclift filed a petition as owner of the steam tug, asking to be admitted to defend accordingly. On this petition no order was ever asked or entered, and no defense set up. By consent, an order of sale was duly…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- The LottawannaSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Waring v. ClarkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
- The J. E. RumbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Ex Parte McNielSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Peyroux and Others v. HOWARD AND VARION.Supreme Court of the United States · 1833
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Electric Boat Co. v. East Hampton Shipping Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- Puget Sound Production Credit Association v. Oil Screw Johnny A, in Rem, and David Olney, Interested Party v. John Hinchman, Interested PartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987