Legal Opinion

Lawler v. Hyde

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 28, 1935No. 8 Div. 646PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, Justice.

Suit between mortgagee and mortgagor, in which the former sought to recover three mules, conveyed to him under a mprtgage by appellant.

Defendant filed two pleas. Plea 1 was intended by the defendant, and so treated by the parties and the court, as the general issue; and plea 2 was a plea of recoupment, in which the defendant .suggested that the plaintiff’s action was founded on a mortgage, and asked that the court require the jury to ascertain the amount of the debt, find in addition thereto “as a defense pleads and says that the consideration for said mortgage indebtedness…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City Council of Montgomery v. Gilmer & TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
  2. Phœnix Insurance v. MoogSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  3. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. GaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  4. Stickney v. Dunaway & LambertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  5. Atlanta Life Ins. Co. v. AshSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United Security Life Insurance v. WisenerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Garrett v. BrewtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  3. Lee Associates, Inc. v. Specialty Construction Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API