Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Rood Estate

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 26, 1972No. 11029PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

41 Mich. App. 405 (1972)

200 N.W.2d 728

In re ROOD ESTATE.

HANNAH

v.

ATTORNEY GENERAL.

Docket No. 11029.

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided June 26, 1972.

Dykema, Gossett, Spencer, Goodnow & Trigg (by Bethel B. Kelley and Martin C. Weisman), and Taylor, Carter & Butterfield, for plaintiffs Gorton Riethmiller and Robert D. Swanson.

Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General, Robert A. Derengoski, Solicitor General, and Edwin M. Bladen, Assistant Attorney General, for defendant-appellee Attorney General.

Transue, Goodstein & Goodstein, for defendants Royal Rood and Marion Belle Rood.

Before: LESINSKI, C.J., and…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Howard Savings Inst. of Newark v. PeepSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
  2. Franklin v. HastingsIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Collins v. Lyon, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1943
  4. Board of Education v. City of RockfordIllinois Supreme Court · 1939
  5. In re the Legacy Given by the Will of MillsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1923

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of ThompsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  2. BD. OF TRUSTEES OF UNIV. OF NC v. Heirs of PrinceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  3. In Re Estes EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Mercy Hospital of Williston v. StillwellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  5. In Re Karp EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API