Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. Pemberton
Texas Supreme Court
On motion for rehearing.
1Opinion of the CourtPhillips, J.
It is urged in the defendant in error’s motion for a rehearing that the Court of Civil Appeals should not be required under the ruling of this court to consider the first assignment of error made in that court by the plaintiff in error, for the reason that, apart from other questions, it is too «general in its terms. The honorable Court of Civil Appeals did not decline to consider the assignment for this reason, and upon that account we did not, in the opinion, notice this as a ground of objection to its consideration. We do not wish to be understood as holding that the assignment is good as…
2Cited by18 opinions
- Barkley v. GibbsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Hines v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Walker v. DawleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Todd v. Southern Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1929
- Ellis v. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.