Legal Opinion

Smith v. Bogart

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 8, 1940No. 29632PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This was an action in replevin originally instituted in the superior court of Seminole county on June 8, 1936, by the defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against the plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, to recover possession of a certain iron derrick and appliances used in connection therewith and of which the plaintiff claimed to be the absolute owner. The property was taken into custody under writ of replevin and returned to the defendant under a redelivery bond. On October 14, 1936, the defendant filed an answer in the form of a general denial.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Holloway v. HallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Cullins v. Overton, SheriffSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
  3. Freeman v. BryantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. First Nat. Bank of Ryan v. Southwestern Surety Ins.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. McAleer v. DawsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brown v. ChappelleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API