Kent v. Kent

OPINION

By DRUCKER, J.

The plaintiff filed an action in forcible entry alleging that the defendant was unlawfully and forcibly detaining possession of her property from plaintiff.

Defendant filed an answer and cross-petition in which he denies the unlawful detention, and says further that

1. On or about September 12, 1936, plaintiff’s premises were vacant, in a run-down condition, in need of repairs to maké it rentable;

2. That the plaintiff verbally proposed to the defendant that he move into and occupy the suite for the balance of his life on the condition that defendant devote his time in part…