Legal Opinion

Krotz v. Krotz

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 13, 1929No. 39885PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWagner, J.

In this action, the husband is -asking for a divorce because of alleged cruel and inhuman treatment by the wife, and the wife is asking for separate maintenance, because of alleged cruel and inhuman treatment by the husband. Our statutory law provides that a divorce from the bonds of matrimony may be decreed against the offending spouse when he or she is guilty of such inhuman treatment as to endanger the life of the complainant. See Sections 10475 and 10476, Code, 1927.

While separate maintenance may be granted for desertion although the statutory period of two years has not expired (Harlow…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shors v. ShorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1906
  2. Massie v. MassieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  3. Pfannebecker v. PfannebeckerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  4. Hill v. HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  5. Wells v. WellsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Weatherill v. WeatherillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1946
  2. Avery v. AverySupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  3. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  4. Sweat v. SweatSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  5. Courtney v. CourtneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API