Fishblatt v. Atlantic City
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On error to the Supreme Court, whose opinion is reported in 49 Vroom 134.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Pitney, Chancellor.
The judgment of the Supreme Court that is here under review affirmed an ordinance of Atlantic City that was brought before that court by certiorari. The argument was had before Justice Trenchard alone, pursuant to section 5 of “An act relative to the writ of certiorari" {Pamph. L. 1903, p. 344). His opinion is reported in 49 Vroom 134.
The section referred to contains a proviso that “If the action be not noticed for argument before a justice at chambers within fifteen days after reasons filed, the hearing shall be before the Supreme…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Fishblatt v. Atlantic CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dubelbeiss v. Town of West HobokenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1911