Legal Opinion

(PC) Lokerson v. Pfeiffer

District Court, E.D. California

Decided December 19, 2024No. 1:23-cv-01513Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JASON LOKERSON, Case No. 1:23-cv-01513-KES-HBK (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE 13 v. TO AMEND COMPLAINT 14 C. PFEIFFER, FOURTEEN DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 15 Defendant. (Doc. No. 22) 16 17 18 19 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint, filed on 20 September 3, 2024. (Doc. No. 22, “Motion”). Plaintiff accompanies his Motion with a proposed 21 Third Amended Complaint. (Doc. No. 23). For the reasons stated below, the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API