Legal Opinion

Daniel v. Georgia State Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 18, 1932No. 21281PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. When a bank has been taken over by the superintendent of banks for the purpose of liquidation, as provided in article 7, section 5 of the banking act ot 1919 as amended, the assets of the bank become a trust fund for the benefit of all the creditors of the bank, and a debtor of the bank can not, by subsequently purchasing an account of a depositor, have it set off at its face value against his own indebtedness to the bank. Alexander v. Peebles, 144 Ga. 78 (86 S. E. 231).

2. Although the profits derived from a partnership may be subject to distribution among the individual members of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Metcalf v. Peoples Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
  2. Alexander v. PeeblesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. GormleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API