Legal Opinion

Conder v. Ledford

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 1, 1915PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Lincoln Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

William Eogers Clay, Commissioner

Affirming.

Plaintiff:, P. B. Ledford, sold to defendants, P. M. Conder and B. D. Holtzclaw, the merchantable timber on two tracts of land lying in Powell county, Kentucky, for the sum of $2,800, of which sum $600 was to be paid in cash, and the balance in four equal installments evidenced by notes maturing four months apart. The contract contained the following provision:

“The party of the first part warrants and defends that the second party has suitable roadways to remove the aforesaid timber. ’ ’

Plaintiff brought suit on the notes and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Baries v. Louisville Electric Light Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  2. Ray v. JeffriesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
  3. Rossi v. Jewell Jellico Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  4. Taylor v. HowserCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1876
  5. Schmidt v. Kentucky River MillsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Drury v. FrankeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
  2. Galliaer v. Southern Harlan Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Williams' AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  4. Hurst v. Southern Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  5. Owings' Administrator v. Gradison Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API