Legal Opinion

Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. v. Ace Hardware Corporation

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 11, 2024No. 1:23-cv-02690Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION SEOUL SEMICONDUCTOR CO., LTD., a Korean Corporation, and SEOUL VIOSYS, CO., LTD., a Korean Corporation, Case No. 23-cv-2690 Plaintiffs, Judge Mary M. Rowland v. ACE HARDWARE CORPORATION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs filed suit against Defendant Ace Hardware, alleging ten counts of patent infringement. [1]. Ace now moves to stay this case pending resolution of Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd. et al v. Feit Electric Co., No. 2-22-cv-05097 (C.D. Cal.). [75]. For the reasons herein, the motion to stay…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Codex Corporation and Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Milgo Electronic Corporation and International Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1977
  3. Trippe Manufacturing Company v. American Power Conversion CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  4. In Re Nintendo of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  5. SPREAD SPECTRUM SCREENING LLC v. Eastman Kodak Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API