Legal Opinion

Martinez v. 348 East 104 Street Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1969PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas Dickens, J.

The purport of this application by the plaintff is to have the pretrial compromise and settlement of this negligence action, which had been consummated by the respective attorneys, set aside, and, in its place, to have an order granted for the restoration of the case, now marked off the calendar, to the Trial Term calendar in its regular order.

*32Subsequent disavowal of the settlement by the plaintiff, forms the cornerstone of this application.

A just view of the facts, relative to the settlement, is the following: On February 7, 1969, when I was presiding in the Pretrial Part, the attorneys for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dexter v. . NortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  2. Ressler v. DruckNew York Supreme Court · 1963
  3. In re the Arbitration between Slifka Fabrics & Schneider Silk Mills, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fox v. Wiener Laces, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Continental Casualty Co. v. Chrysler Construction Co., New York County Courts1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API