Legal Opinion

Overstreet v. Barr

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 19, 1934PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OpmiON op the Court by

Creal, Commissioner

Affirming.

Marital troubles between James H. Barr and Bertha Barr, his wife, running through a course of years, culminated in an action for divorce and alimony filed by her in January, 1931; however, after that action was filed, a reconciliation was effected which proved to be short lived. Because of this reconciliation the action was dismissed and another of like character was filed by Mrs. Barr on March 21, 1931. The husband paid to Mr. Beckham Overstreet, who represented Mrs. Barr in both of the actions, $100 covering his fee for services in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pereira v. PereiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Lynde v. LyndeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
  3. Newman v. FreitasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Jordan v. WestermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Hamilton v. HamiltonIllinois Supreme Court · 1878

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re the Proceedings for the Discipline of SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Barelli v. LevinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Keesee v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  4. Dodd v. DoddCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
  5. Salyersville National Bank v. Jackie BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API