Legal Opinion

State v. Cooley

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided January 29, 1991No. 0-430, 89-1076PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DONIELSON, Presiding Judge.

Defendant, Steven Cooley, was charged with the crime of forgery. He was also accused of being a habitual offender. Cooley chose to represent himself; however, at the defendant’s request, standby counsel was appointed to assist him in clarifying points of law and obtaining research materials.

The jury found Cooley guilty of forgery. Cooley was also found to be a habitual offender. He has appealed the resulting conviction and sentence.

Cooley contends the district court placed improper limits on his exercise of his sixth-amendment right to proceed pro se. He argues the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Bounds v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. United States v. Gary HalbertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. United States v. Gjon N. Nivica, United States of America v. Mark L. Pedley, A/K/A Jack Williams, Mark WellingtonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Metcalf v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. CooleySupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  3. Reisenauer v. SchaeferNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2008
  5. State v. MottCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API