Rubinfeld v. Stolts
New York Supreme Court
Action by Samuel Rubinfeld, an infant, by Charles Rubinfeld, his guardian ad litem, against Julius W. Stolts, as president of J. & J. W. Stolts. Motion for a bill of particulars granted.
1Opinion of the CourtGiegerich, J.
While it is true that in the cases cited by the plaintiff (Bowman Cycle Co. v. Dyer, 23 Misc. Rep. 620, 52 N. Y. Supp. 159; Dorgan v. Scheer, 31 Misc. Rep. 801, 62 N. Y. Supp. 1030; Wales Mfg. Co. v. Lazzaro, 19 Misc. Rep. 477, 43 N. Y. Supp. 1110; Villiers v. Third Ave. R. R., 22 Misc. Rep. 17, 48 N. Y. Supp. 614; Webster v. Fitchburg R. R., 32 Misc. Rep. 442, 66 N. Y. Supp. 220), as well as in some text-books on practice (1 Nichols, New York Practice, 873; Bradbury’s Rules of Pleading, 1416), it is stated that in order to obtain a bill of particulars the affidavit must show the ignorance of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dwyer v. SlatteryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Havholm v. Whale Creek Iron WorksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
- Bjork v. Post & McCordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Wales Manufacturing Co. v. LazzaroAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897
- Waller v. Degnon Contracting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.