Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Haid

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 20, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Relator in this proceeding seeks to quash the opinion of the St. Louis Court of Appeals in the case of Cook v. Sears, Roebuck Co., 51 S.W.2d 134, on the ground that it is in conflict with decisions of this court. [1] On certiorari, our review is limited to a determination of whether the opinion of the Court of Appeals conflicts with a principle of law announced by controlling decisions of this court. The opinion of the Court of Appeals reads as follows:

"This is an appeal from an order granting defendant's motion for new trial upon a judgment in favor of the plaintiffs.
"The plaintiffs brought…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Walker v. OwenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
  2. Kelly v. ThueySupreme Court of Missouri · 1898
  3. State v. MessinoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  4. Wheeler v. Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  5. Easton v. CourtwrightSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Austin & Bass Builders, Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  2. Masonic Home v. WindsorSupreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  3. State Ex Rel. Kelsey v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
  4. McQueen v. HuelsingMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. King v. Laclede Gas Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API