Legal Opinion

Lensenig v. Thompson

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lancaster County

Decided July 1, 1873Published

Appeal from the court of Common Pleas of Lancaster county.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Sharswood, J.

That the charge in favor of the widow of Tilghman Thompson was a fixed lien, not divested by the sheriff’s sale on a junior incumbrance is to be considered as now settled beyond any question. Indeed, it was not a matter in dispute either in the court below or here. It has been well settled, as a general rule, that a judicial sale will not discharge an incumbrance, whether created by the law or by the parties, when the charge stands in the title, and can be discharged only by the court undertaking to administer the fund by investing it in order to fulfil the purpose of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bantleon v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1809
  2. Bear v. WhislerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1838
  3. Fisher v. KeanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1832
  4. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1841

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API