Legal Opinion

Jeffery B. Hicks v. Martha L. Jordan

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided February 2, 2006No. 05-14349; D.C. Docket 04-00300-CV-LSC-SUnpublishedCited by 4 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

Jeffery B. Hicks, a pro se federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus, which was filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Hicks’s petition was dismissed because he failed to exhaust his administrative remedies, and alternatively, on the merits. On appeal, Hicks argues that the Government waived any failure to exhaust administrative remedies because the Government addressed the substance of Hicks’s claims in its arguments. Hicks also contends that because he wrote several letters to the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) regarding his nunc pro tunc…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Alexander v. HawkCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  4. Douglas J. MacGinnitie v. Hobbs Group LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  5. Marie Von Hoffburg v. Clifford Alexander, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jones v. ZenkDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2007
  2. Picklesimer v. RardinDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
  3. Robert Baggott v. Alan Cohen, Warden, FPC MontgomeryDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2026
  4. Vazquez v. KnightDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API