Enzor v. United States
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Dissent
Ferguson, Judge'
(dissenting) :
I dissent.
In order to deny the appellant the relief he seeks, the principal opinion holds that the accused’s conviction was final on May 5, 1969, the date of the decision of the board of review, despite the fact that the accused did not even receive a copy of that decision until June 9, 1969, some thirty-five days thereafter. Finality on May 5th is necessary to the denial of appellant’s petition because this Court, in Mercer v Dillon, 19 USCMA 264, 265, 41 CMR 264 (1970), held that O’Callahan v Parker, 395 US 258, 23 L Ed 2d 291, 89 S Ct 1683 (1969), would be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- O'Callahan v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. BorysUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- Mercer v. DillonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
- Brant v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.