Legal Opinion

Honeycutt v. Whitten

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 4, 1921No. 24125PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Seventh Judicial District Court, Parish of Richland; John McIntosh, Judge. Action by M. H. Honeycutt against J. L. Whitten. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of the Case.

MONROE, C. J.

On October 11, 1919, plaintiff filed an affidavit in the district court upon which certain of the property of the defendant was taken into the possession of the sheriff under a writ of provisional'seizure, and two days later he filed a petition setting forth his claims more specifically, and praying for a writ of attachment, under which the Rayville State Bank was garnished and answered that defendant had on deposit $09.73, and had left with the bank a compress receipt for one bale of cotton for account of Oza Whitten. The claim sued on is said to have…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Murphy v. MyarSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
  2. Thomas v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  3. Foster v. GoodwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
  4. Sainet v. Widow DuchampSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1859

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Le Blanc v. GuyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API