Woodruff v. Cokeville Light & Power Co.
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Einer, Justice.
The case is here on direct appeal. Eespondent has filed a motion to dismiss the cause, because the appellant failed to serve upon respondent or its counsel his brief, as required by the rules of this court, and also because the record on appeal was not filed in the District Court, wherein the judgment appealed from was rendered, within seventy days from the date of the entry of said judgment, as required by law. Attached to the motion to dismiss is an affidavit of counsel for respondent, setting out that no service of appellant’s brief was made upon him or upon respondent…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. KellyWyoming Supreme Court · 1925
- Berry v. SampleWyoming Supreme Court · 1922
- Scott v. Wyoming Rock Products Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1928
3Cited by4 opinions
- W.H. Holliday v. BundyWyoming Supreme Court · 1930
- Henning v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
- Wy-Tex Corp. v. McCulloughWyoming Supreme Court · 1936
- Wolfe v. CarrelsWyoming Supreme Court · 1934