Legal Opinion

The Pillsbury Co. v. West Carrollton Parchment

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided July 29, 2008No. 07-14388Unpublished

1Per curiam

I. OVERVIEW

Pillsbury Company, Inc. (“Pillsbury”) challenges the district court’s order granting summai’y judgment for West Carroll-ton Parchment Company, Inc. (West Carrollton) on Pillsbury’s claims that West Carrollton negligently manufactured pie crust dividers and then negligently failed to warn Pillsbury of the danger the pie crust dividers posed to Pillsbury’s pie crust. Because there are genuine issues of material fact in dispute, the district court’s summary judgment order is REVERSED.

II. BACKGROUND 1

Pillsbury manufactured frozen pie crusts which were sold in stacks of two with a wax…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rioux v. City of Atlanta, Ga.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
  2. Michael J. OLMSTED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TACO BELL CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
  3. The Pillsbury Company v. West Carrollton ParchmentCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API