Legal Opinion
Morrison v. Kimmelman
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 30, 1986No. Civ. A. 83-1428PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STERN, District Judge.
This case is here on remand from the United States Supreme Court, Kimmelman v. Morrison, — U.S. -, 106 S.Ct. 2574, 91 L.Ed.2d 305 (1986), affirming, Morrison v. Kimmelman, 752 F.2d 918 (3d Cir.1985), vacating and remanding, 579 F.Supp. 796 (D.N.J.1985). We had granted petitioner’s habeas corpus petition under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 (1976), holding that petitioner was denied his sixth amendment right to effective assistance of counsel, in light of counsel’s failure to conduct any discovery, and his failure to make a timely request for exclusion of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Stone v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Glenn v. AikenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Charles A. Perkins v. Robert LecureuxCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Perry v. MarylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1999
- Hyden v. LAW FIRM OF McCORMICK, ETC.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1993
- Ramos v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.