Legal Opinion

Hofheimer v. Seaboard Citizens' National Bank

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided January 15, 1931PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

This case was heard and decided by this court on June 12, 1930. On the bank’s petition a rehearing was allowed and upon that rehearing tMs court is of opinion to adhere to its former judgment.

We have heretofore pointed out that the bank upon consolidation took only what the Federal statute gave. In Ex parte Worcester County Nat. Bank, 279 U. S. 347, 49 S. Ct. 368, Chief Justice Taft said:

“It is very clear to us that Congress, in the enactment of section 3 of the act of February 25, 1927, was anxious even to the point of repetition to show that it wished to avoid' any provision in…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ex Parte Worcester County National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1929

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wallace v. WallaceSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
  2. Fidelity-Baltimore National Bank, a Body Corporate v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
  3. Security Cent. Nat'l Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1935
  4. Bartee v. VitocruzSupreme Court of Virginia · 2014
  5. Central Fidelity Bank v. GoodeLynchburg County Circuit Court · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API