Legal Opinion

United States v. Neil B. Shangold

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 30, 1992No. 90-50568Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

959 F.2d 243

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

Neil B. SHANGOLD, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 90-50568.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted March 25, 1992.*

Decided March 30, 1992.

Before JAMES R. BROWNING, TANG and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. AguilarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. Walter Ward Dorrell, IIICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
  3. United States v. Samantha D. Lopez Ronald J. McIntoshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. The People of the Territory of Guam v. Jose Vicente AgualoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API