Legal Opinion

Antiballistic Security & Protection, Inc. v. Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided June 7, 2011No. Civil Action 09-02443 (ABJ)Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

AMY BERMAN JACKSON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Antiballistic Security and Protection, Inc. (“ASAP”), James Quinn, and Gale Leslie Quinn (collectively “plaintiffs”) bring this action for legal malpractice and breach of fiduciary duty against a law firm, Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC (“Baker Donelson”) and one of its shareholders, Susan McBee (collectively “defendants”). Defendants have moved to dismiss under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) for lack of subject matter jurisdic tion and Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & ManufacturingSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API