Goldstein v. Morgan
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Pottawattamie District Court. — HoN. A. B. Thornell, Judge. ActioN of replevin to recover a stock of boots and shoes, which had been levied upon by defendant, sheriff, under writs of attachment issued'in certain actions against one E. E. Adams. Trial to a jury, verdict and julgment for the defendant, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.
This case involves no new principle of law. . Plaintiff claims a right to the possession of the property under a bill of sale therefor executed by E. E. Adams on or about November 17, 1899. Defendant, as sheriff, levied on the property on the same day, under writs'of attachment issued in actions instituted against E. E. Adams, and he claims that plaintiff’s bill of sale was and is fraudulent and void, for that it. was executed with intent to hinder, delay, and defraud Adams’ creditors. The allegation of fraud was denied by plaintiff, and on these issues the case was submitted to a jury..
Alex…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Huss v. Chicago Great Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1901
- State v. StegnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- Copeland v. FerrisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
3Cited by3 opinions
- Humble Oil & Refining Co. v. McLeanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Hall Roberts' Son, Inc. v. PlahtSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
- Lake v. MootsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932