Legal Opinion

Greening v. Steele

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 28, 1894PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Error to Daviess Circuit Court. — Hon. C. H. S. Goodman, Judge. (1) The contract signed by both Steele and Greening is full and complete, and no additional stipulations could be engrafted upon it without Steele’s consent. Pearson v. Carson, 69 Mo. 550; Robinson v. Jarvis, 25 Mo.

Read the full summary

Error to Daviess Circuit Court. — Hon. C. H. S. Goodman, Judge. (1) The contract signed by both Steele and Greening is full and complete, and no additional stipulations could be engrafted upon it without Steele’s consent. Pearson v. Carson, 69 Mo. 550; Robinson v. Jarvis, 25 Mo. App. 451. (2) Where a contract is plain and complete in itself, and is not procured by fraud or deceit, the person making it can not be heard to say that he did not enter into such contract, but a different one. Hais v. Wamsley, 32 Mo. App. 115. (3) The written contract set forth in the defendant’s answer, not being…

1Opinion of the CourtMacearlane, J.

This is a suit in equity the purpose of which is to cancel a certain deed made by plaintiff to defendant to eighty acres of land in Daviess county. The petition charges, in substance, that, after negotiations for an exchange of the eighty acres of land owned by plaintiff, for two hundred and forty acres of land owned by defendant, situate in the state of Kansas, an agreement was reached by which the exchange could be effected, provided the Kansas land answered the description, in quality and improvements thereon, as represented by defendant, and to determine which plaintiff was to examine the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Black River Lumber Co. v. WarnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887
  2. Brown v. BowenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Roe v. Bank of VersaillesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  2. Kennedy v. BowlingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928
  3. Johnson v. FechtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1904
  4. Young v. RuhwedelMissouri Court of Appeals · 1906
  5. Minnesota Thresher Manufacturing Co. v. Grant City Lumber & Hardware Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API