Legal Opinion

Ierardi v. Farmers Trust Co. of Newark

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided November 21, 1928No. 10PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pennewill, C. J.,

delivering the opinion of the court:

1. Defendant claims that it does not appear from the third count of the declaration that there was any causal connection between the Pennsylvania statute and the injuries suffered by the plaintiff, the argument being that the purpose of the statute was only to regulate traffic, and not to protect persons working in the street. In the absence of a clear intent to that effect, we cannot say that such was the only purpose of the statute. So far as appears, it was intended to protect any one lawfully in the street, whether riding in some…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. King v. Viscoloid Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  2. New Orleans v. Gaines's AdministratorSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Smith v. Yellow Cab Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. Travelers' Ins. Co. v. Great Lakes Engineering Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
  5. Gentile v. Philadelphia & Reading Ry.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Storey v. CamperSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  2. Catalfano v. HigginsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1962
  3. Phillips v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  4. Levitt v. SIMCO SALES SERVICE OF PENNASuperior Court of Delaware · 1957
  5. Frank C. Sparks Co. v. Huber Baking Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API