Legal Opinion

American Trust & Savings Bank v. Austin

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1898PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Action of interpleader.

1Opinion of the CourtHiscock, J.

This action became one of interpleader and equity through the fact that one Thalheimer holding some moneys claimed by the plaintiff and also by the present defendants was allowed to pay the same into court and have substituted as defendants herein said present defendants.

One Hoffmeyer shipped from Chicago to said Thalheimer, at Syracuse, two lots of butter. He drew two drafts upon said Thalheimer for the value thereof claimed by him, being nearly $500. Upon said drafts and the -bills of lading for the butter so shipped as aforesaid he obtained from plaintiff the full amount of the drafts,…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Nat. Bank of Oklahoma City v. WoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. Freeport Bank of Freeport v. ViemeisterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
  3. American National Bank v. WarrenNew York Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Home Bank & Trust Co. v. BogoradAppellate Court of Illinois · 1926
  5. City Nat. Bank of Hobart v. State Ex Rel. FreelingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API