Legal Opinion

Jay Thorpe and Kim Thorpe v. WaterTec of Tucson, Inc., an Arizona corporation; A.O. Smith Corporation, a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1–10, inclusive

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided September 3, 2026No. 4:26-cv-00006Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Jay Thorpe and Kim Thorpe, No. CV-26-00006-TUC-SHR (EJM) 10 Plaintiffs, 11 v. ORDER 12 WaterTec of Tucson, Inc., an Arizona corporation; A.O. Smith Corporation, a 13 Delaware corporation; and DOES 1–10, 14 inclusive, 15 Defendants. 16 Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Remand (Doc. 5). 17 Defendant A.O. Smith Corporation has filed a response in opposition (Doc. 14), and 18 Plaintiffs replied (Doc. 15).1 The motion is ripe for review. In its discretion, the Court 19 finds this case…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. Carvalho v. Equifax Information Services, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Navarro Savings Assn. v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API