Legal Opinion

Thompson v. Harbine, Jr.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 1925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBuchwalter, P. J.

The action below was to secure the allowance of a claim on a promissory note, which had been disallowed by William G. Thompson, as the assignee of Edward S. Shroyer. The assignee, as defendant, filed an answer denying that plaintiff was entitled under the laws of Ohio to interest as claimed in the petition.

On a hearing on a motion for judgment on the pleadings the court granted judgment, allowing the full claim of the plaintiff, as prayed for. Error is now prosecuted to this judgment.

It is averred in the petition that on April 9, 1924, Edward S. Shroyer and his wife executed and delivered to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Travelers' Ins. Co. v. Great Lakes Engineering Works Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Seibel v. SeibelOhio Court of Appeals · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API