Legal Opinion

City of Lima v. Farley

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 8, 1925No. 4253PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.

John W. Parley entered into a contract with the eity of Lima, Ohio, on October 28, 1919, by which he agreed to construct a sewer about 3 miles in length, varying in size from 84 inches at the beginning to a much smaller dimension at the end, for $528,000. He completed the work in the early part of 3922, and shortly thereafter brought this action in damages for breach of an implied warranty arising from false representations as to borings made by the eity preparatory to letting the work, upon which,, as he averred, he relied in entering into the contract. In addition to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hollerbach v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Christie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  3. United States v. Atlantic Dredging Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. MacArthur Brothers Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Sanitary Dist. of Chicago v. RickerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1899

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. S & M Constructors, Inc. v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Sandy Hites Co. v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  3. Davis v. Commissioners of SewerageDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1936
  4. Cohn v. United States Shipping BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1927
  5. Harrison Construction Co. v. Ohio Turnpike CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API