Legal Opinion

Liachovitzky v. New York Life Insurance

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 3, 1925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBijur, J.

The particular defect to which defendant’s motion is addressed is failure to allege the applicable law of Russia.

The complaint sets forth two causes of action. It alleges, as the first, that in December, 1902, defendant issued in Russia a twenty-year life insurance policy to plaintiff under the terms of which it promised to pay on December 1, 1922, in the city of Petrograd, Russia, the sum of 3,000 rubles, if plaintiff then survived, in consideration of plaintiff’s payment of annual premiums; “ that said policy and all the sums due thereon and thereunder were and are payable at the City of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pritchard v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. New York Life Insurance v. StathamSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Cuba Railroad v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Parrot v. Mexican Central Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  5. Union National Bank of Chicago v. ChapmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Arams v. AramsNew York Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API