Legal Opinion

Hurxthal v. St. Lawerence Boom & Mfg. Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1909PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Greenbrier County, Action by Josie M. Hurxthal against the St. Lawerence-Boom &' Manufacturing Company. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Robinson, Judge:

This writ of error is a sequel to the decision of the case-reported in 53 W. Va. 87. An understanding of the facts is there disclosed. After that reversal, a new suit on the same-cause of action was instituted. It was later consolidated with *348■the old suit, by agreement, it seems. Trial of the case resulted in a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $2500. Upon that verdict, judgment was rendered over the motion of defendant to set aside the same and award a new trial. The defendant has brought the case here. It assigns as error the giving of certain instructions to the jury and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Allison v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Coalmer v. BarrettWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Hargreaves v. KimberlyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Hurxthal v. Boom Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Pickens v. Boom Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1905

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Carpenter v. HymanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Lyon v. Grasselli Chemical Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Sammons Bros. Const. Co. v. Elk Creek Coal Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Ohio-West Virginia Co. v. Chesapeake & Ohio Ry. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Reiser v. LawrenceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API