Legal Opinion

Durand v. Leigh

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 7, 1961PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*630Certain findings of fact and conclusions of law disapproved and reversed and new findings made. Memorandum: The finding by the trial court that the use of the lane across the plaintiff’s property by the defendants was adverse was not supported by the evidence. The evidence established that the user had originated in permission given by the plaintiff’s predecessor in title to the defendants’ predecessor in title. “If permissive in its inception, such permissive character will continue of the same nature, and no adverse user can arise until there is a distinct and positive assertion of a right…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Moore v. DayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1921
  2. Moore v. . DayNew York Court of Appeals · 1923

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Tonawanda v. Ellicott Creek Homeowners Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Coup. v. BarthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Hassinger v. KlineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API